May 18, 2007 -- WASHINGTON – Internet censorship around the world is becoming more pervasive and sophisticated, with government-directed content filtering documented in at least 25 countries, according to a comprehensive report to be released today.
Political, social and cultural content are the primary targets of censorship, along with applications such as Google Maps and the Internet phone program Skype, according to the OpenNet Initiative, a partnership of more than 50 researchers who conducted tests on Internet access in 41 countries.
The research, conducted in 2006 and early this year, identified six countries with "pervasive" filtering of political content: Burma, China, Iran, Syria, Tunisia and Vietnam.
"Online censorship is growing in scale, scope and sophistication around the world, which is not surprising, given the importance of the medium," said John Palfrey, executive director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School.
The report was conducted by groups at four universities – Harvard, Cambridge, Oxford and Toronto – and covered thousands of Web sites and 120 Internet service providers.
To the surprise of some researchers, no filtering was found in Russia, Egypt, Algeria, Israel, or the West Bank and Gaza, even for information that might be seen as a threat to security.
The most active countries censoring social content, ranging from satire to religious debate to pornography, were in the Middle East: Iran, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen.
South Korea's filtering system heavily censors information about one subject: North Korea.
Researchers chose the 41 countries based on reports of filtering and surveillance.
Filtering the World Wide Web
» The OpenNet Initiative conducted research in 41 countries suspected of Internet censorship. In some countries, the filtering is quite limited (India); in others (China, Iran) it's extensive. The breakdown:
» Evidence of filtering: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Burma, China, Ethiopia, India, Iran, Jordan, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Yemen
» Suspected filtering: Belarus, Kazakhstan
» No evidence of filtering: Afghanistan, Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Israel, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Moldova, Nepal, Russia (based on preliminary tests), Ukraine, Venezuela, West Bank/Gaza, Zimbabwe
Source: Berkman Center for Internet & Society
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
18th May 2007 08:28 #1
Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 289,271
Report shows censorship of Internet on the rise
-
27th December 2007 03:43 #2
Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 289,271
CAIRO, Egypt, December 26, 2007 (MCT) -- In Iran, a large red icon pops up on computer screens. In Syria, there's a discreet note from the filter. Other Arab nations display "blocked" in bold lettering or issue crafty "page not found" replies.
However the censors put it, the message is clear: You're not permitted to see this Web site.
Governments in the Middle East are stepping up a campaign of censorship and surveillance in an effort to prevent an estimated 33.5 million Internet users from viewing a variety of Web sites whose topics range from human rights to pornography. As a result, millions of Middle Easterners are finding it harder by the day to access popular news and entertainment sites such as Facebook, MySpace, YouTube and Flickr.
Five of the world's top 13 Internet censors are in the Middle East, according to the most recent report from Reporters Without Borders, the journalism advocacy group that lobbies against Web censorship.
Only four Arab countries have little or no filtering: Lebanon, Morocco, Jordan and Egypt - but Egyptian politicians are considering a law that would criminalize some online activity.
At the other end of the spectrum are Saudi Arabia and Syria, consistently described by human rights groups as the most hostile toward the Internet. The rest of the region falls somewhere in between, with governments importing the latest technology to narrow the number of sites available to the public and drafting laws to curb online dissent.
The prohibitions have led to an explosion in circumventors, proxy servers that allow Internet users to bypass workplace or government filters. In cyber cafes from Damascus to Dubai, patrons furtively browse blocked sites and swap Web addresses for the latest "proxies."
The most tech-savvy young Arabs and Iranians use new proxies every day, trying to stay a step ahead of government censors.
Last month, Syrian authorities banned several more sites, including the book and music vendor Amazon.com. The government reportedly uses a filtering system called Thundercache to block content from sites such as Blogspot, Hotmail, Skype and YouTube. Many Arabic-language news sites also are banned.
In Iraq and the Palestinian territories, the Internet is policed mainly by the owners of Internet cafes and by Internet users themselves, according to monitoring groups. In both places, Islamist militants have attacked Internet cafes, accusing patrons of looking at pornography or chatting with members of the opposite sex.
In Iraq, the U.S. military is the only official Internet censor - operational security measures prevent American troops from using some sites and commanders have shut down cyber cafes in areas where insurgents use the Internet to share intelligence and plot attacks.
More typical is the censorship that's spreading throughout Arab states in North Africa. Tunisian authorities block several sites, human rights workers said, but they've also begun to hold the owners of Internet cafes liable if political activists use their establishments to post critical news about the government.
After years of Internet freedom, Sudan reportedly has purchased a state-of-the-art blocking program that prohibits access to political sites and literary works that range from racy fiction to a book that the government deemed offensive to Islam's Prophet Muhammad. Morocco, Algeria and Libya also have come under fire from human rights watchdogs because of their prosecution of online dissidents.
In Egypt, the Arab world's most populous nation and home to an estimated 6 million Internet users, the government offers cheap dial-up browsing to anyone with a telephone line and authorities do little or no filtering, so video-sharing platforms, social-networking sites, most opposition sites and pornography are all easily accessible.
But police have rounded up at least three bloggers and harassed many more in recent years, according to Reporters Without Border. Activists also fear more filtering after an Egyptian court last year ruled that authorities could block, suspend or shut down any Web site that could pose a threat to "national security," vague wording that could lead to criminal charges for dozens of Egyptian bloggers.
Abdel Moneim Mahmoud, 28, has been arrested and harassed by Egyptian authorities several times in connection with his blog promoting the Muslim Brotherhood, a powerful Sunni Islamist opposition group. Because he uses Blogspot, the U.S.-based weblog platform, the Egyptian government hasn't been able to block his blog without banning the site altogether.
"They threatened, 'If you don't stop blogging, we will arrest you' every month," Mahmoud said. "Police officers ask about specific things on our blogs when they call us in for investigation. They use IP-address tracking to find out who is writing which blog."
Iran's hard-line Shiite Muslim leadership is another zealous censor of the Internet. The government boasts of filtering 10 million "immoral" Web sites in addition to all the major social networking outfits and dozens of pages about religion or politics.
For the past year, according to human rights groups, Iranian authorities also have zeroed in on online publications dealing with women's rights. Two prominent "cyber feminists" were arrested in the past month on charges of distorting public opinion and drawing negative publicity to Iran through the postings on the Web.
Even in a place as glitzy and modern as Dubai, the regional shopping hub in the United Arab Emirates, a strict filtering system targets pornographic and political sites. Dubai residents can drink and party all night long, but they're not allowed to read about such exploits on some blogs penned by Western expatriates.
Earlier this year, residents were outraged by tentative plans to extend the censorship to so-called free zones, where media and multinational companies can - for now - surf the Web unfiltered. Foreign workers in Dubai have decried the ban on voice software such as Skype, which allows them to call home for free. Critics call it economic censorship of the Internet, an attempt by state-backed telecommunications firms to build their revenue from international calls.
The ultraconservative Saudi government, a close U.S. ally, blocks thousands of Web sites that deal with pornography, religion, politics and human rights. Medical students at Saudi universities have complained that they can't even access scientific sites to study human anatomy.
Fed up with the growing list of banned sites, a 25-year-old finance student named Hani Noor helped his cousin to create a Facebook group called, "We All Hope They Don't Block Facebook in Saudi Arabia." As of Monday, the group had 225 members and a message board that focused on tips for the best proxies to get around government bans.
Noor, however, hit on an even better solution: He signed up for satellite Internet, which means his connection is now free from the long arm of the Saudi censors.
"I'm off the hook," Noor said with a triumphant laugh in a telephone interview from his home in Saudi Arabia. "We are winning. They're blocking, but we've always found a way to overcome it."
-
27th December 2007 04:58 #3
Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- In da hood
- Posts
- 7,136
hah!! al no censorship fil west bank al!
NEVER grow up
Al Imran 147 - BE OPTIMISTIC!!
your ≠ you’re


-
29th December 2007 02:09 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 1,028
Looks like we ALL are at the 'same wave' and unfortuntely, flooding the forums with the same info. See:
Middle East countries are among the most zealous Internet censors
http://www.algeria.com/forums/238843-post3.html
Posted here in 26th December 2007, 13:28CAIRO, Egypt | In Iran, a large red icon pops up on computer screens. In Syria, there is a discreet note from the filter. Other Arab nations display "blocked" in bold letters or issue "page not found" replies.
We have to pay more attention... SEO doesn't like this!
However the censors put it, the message is clear: You're not permitted to see this Web site.Sed et tortor vitae turpis blandit fermentum. Integer lacus turpis, sem. Aliquam erat volutpat. Suspendisse a nibh ut dolor facilisis molestie. Sed et pede. Sed vitae leo. Phasellus varius ultricies eros. Sed tempor, metus id adipiscing porttitor, diam turpis tempor eros. Nam id libero ut nisl posuere ultricies. Phasellus sed nibh eget lorem consectetuer tempus. Volutpat.
-
29th December 2007 02:31 #5
Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 289,271
-
29th December 2007 03:30 #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 1,028
Me? Sure!
Only a smart or old member as BB, for example, could find a subject in the archives faster than placing a comment on a brand new entry.
"an edited version of the full article posted here"
???

???
See the timestamp of the entry "The most zealous Internet censors"
26th December 2007, 13:28
in Mapping Web 2.0 Censorship
1st December 2007, 01:45
I'm only a moderator here, have no 'powers' to manual edit datetime stamps and etc!
...
Sed et tortor vitae turpis blandit fermentum. Integer lacus turpis, sem. Aliquam erat volutpat. Suspendisse a nibh ut dolor facilisis molestie. Sed et pede. Sed vitae leo. Phasellus varius ultricies eros. Sed tempor, metus id adipiscing porttitor, diam turpis tempor eros. Nam id libero ut nisl posuere ultricies. Phasellus sed nibh eget lorem consectetuer tempus. Volutpat.
-
29th December 2007 04:05 #7
Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 289,271
What does that have to do with anything? The article above (Post 2), in this thread about Internet censorship, is not identical to the evidently edited version that you posted elsewhere.
If you're trying to suggest that any and all references to Internet censorship belong in the thread that you created, about some Internet censorship mapping project, since when did that rule come into force?
I didn't make a song and dance about other articles being posted about censorship on other threads - it seems rather pointless to me.







LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Bangladesh
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Russia
Scotland
South Africa
Ukraine
Virtual Countries