As we approach the third anniversary of the onset of the Iraq war, it seems very unlikely that history will judge either the intervention itself or the ideas animating it kindly. By invading Iraq, the Bush administration created a self-fulfilling prophecy: Iraq has now replaced Afghanistan as a magnet, a training ground and an operational base for jihadist terrorists, with plenty of American targets to shoot at. The United States still has a chance of creating a Shiite-dominated democratic Iraq, but the new government will be very weak for years to come; the resulting power vacuum will invite outside influence from all of Iraq's neighbors, including Iran. There are clear benefits to the Iraqi people from the removal of Saddam Hussein's dictatorship, and perhaps some positive spillover effects in Lebanon and Syria. But it is very hard to see how these developments in themselves justify the blood and treasure that the United States has spent on the project to this point.
The so-called Bush Doctrine that set the framework for the administration's first term is now in shambles....
After Neoconservatism
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
21st February 2006 03:24 #1
Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 289,462
-
21st February 2006 22:54 #2
Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 289,462
They most certainly did.
-
21st February 2006 22:55 #3
Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 289,462







LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bangladesh
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Russia
Scotland
South Africa
Ukraine
Virtual Countries