December 6, 2009 -- Could Mr. Squiggles be harboring too much of two toxic metals? That’s the opinion of Good Guide, which released a review Friday in which it found potentially unsafe levels of tin and antimony on Mr. Squiggles. The report raises questions about whether there will be a Zhu Zhu pets recall. The company that manufactures Zhu Zhu pets, Cepia LLC, reacted strongly to the news, maintaining that there is nothing wrong with its motorized hamsters. “We are disputing the findings of Good Guide and we are 100 percent confident that Mr. Squiggles, and all other Zhu Zhu Toys, are safe and compliant with all U.S. and European standards for consumer health and safety in toys,” said Russ Hornsby, CEO of Cepia LLC, the company that makes Zhu Zhu pets, in a press release.
The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 limits antimony to no more than 60 parts per million. Good Guide says it found 93 ppm in Mr. Squiggles’ fur and 103 in its nose. Tests in animals have attributed a series of ailments large-scale consumption of antimony, the Department of Health and Human Services’ (DHHS) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease says. Yet the DHHS also says it does not “know what other health effects would occur to people who swallow antimony.”
As for tin, the toy industry currently upholds no voluntary standard for acceptable levels of the metal. While acceptable levels for different metals vary widely, consumers can come into contact with tin in some simple ways. Levels of tin approaching 100 ppm in unlacquered tin cans — like those containing light-colored fruit because tin helps maintain the fruit’s color — are possible, according to the DHHS registry. Almost 90 percent of cans, however, are lacquered, according to the registry. The registry goes on to say, “there are no reports of adverse developmental effects in humans exposed to tin or its compounds, or of inorganic tin in animals.”
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
6th December 2009 23:38 #1
Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 266,388
-
7th December 2009 07:49 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 302
If people would just buy (and look after) actual hamsters, there wouldn't be this problem, instead of trying to replace all of the natural creatures in the world with little electronic versions (though I accept if someone is allergic to animal fur)... but then I'm sure the parents would be up in arms when they found the toxic faecal matter that the fluffy little squealing thing produced....
-
7th December 2009 09:06 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 143
Just the sort of thing my daughter would love too.
It's a bit scary to think about really...just have to hope that ''most'' things are tested properly, made safely and that people will be honest.
This was an interesting one it Australia.







LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bangladesh
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Russia
Scotland
South Africa
Ukraine
Virtual Countries