Premise: The Algerian individual has been battered to the last ounce of energy (physical or intellectual).
1. Saddam and the BAATH scholl of thought will die in one
of its capitals(Bagdad). The other ones of lesser
influence(Syria, Egypt, and Algeria) will follow in a
lesser brutal ways as follows:
a. Chirac&France supporters and legitimizers of forceful
governments in North-Africa will loose all credibility,
and the value of his/its Veto right will go down with it.
There won't be any reliance in it, thus the regime is
seing itself on the map of the Axis of Evil - Bush
speech of last month refers to democracy striving from
Morroco to Bahrein! Then, the international court has
just opoened for business, Chirac or any French
government will not be able to provide immunity ! and
there are 200 000 lives to account for in ALgeria alone!
The generals will between now and 2004-start of full
gear operations of the court try to secure the booty,
i.e. take sell out the country to French, german,
Italian and Spanish companies.
2. Semi-open elections will take place in Algeria, and the
political landscape will take another shape ! Free
expression of one's aspirations and free association
will be able to achieve some results. The majority then,
will struggle for a while until they find a common
purpose beyond the human conditions improvement, but
rather a total shift in ideology. Freedom and culture
will take reach another hight, and Islam will compete as
a theory and source of inspiration for an ethical system.
It will fail miserably, and with it the Arabic language
will vanish as well but progressively.
3. Troubles now being seen in Algeria will rise in the
neighboring countries. Pro-Africanism will reach its
potential, and the new world order will begin, and with
it a return to a true nationalism and discovery of North
African of their true heritage. The healing process will
begin, and the real reconciliation much needed will take
place.
4. Algeria and Africa at large will become the prime
unpolluted place for immigration by North-Americans and
Arabia for the Western-Europeans. Arab-American/Anglo
relationship will suffer and become extremely domaged.
The American corporate will find a abetter opportunity
in Africa.
5. South and East Africa will be transit centers between
the 2 continents, whereas North-Africa a East-West/South-
North point of transit.
6. Western-European and North African liaisons will be the
balancing weights between the greater EAST-WEAST
ideologies; Just as the Koreas and Japan-China are the
Pivots on the other side.
And Mohamed: Prend ta valise this time for good. Not from north to south but from west to east !
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: Algerian History 2004-2024
-
28th March 2003 16:38 #1
-
25th April 2003 07:43 #2
1. SADDAM OUT
News April 4th 2003 - Arab League Dissolved reports ALgerian papers- The Article
will translate into ENglish soon).
La Ligue arabe en voix de disparition
Vers l’éclatement ?
Par Hani Rabah
Tous les diplomates arabes vous le diront : la première victime après la chute du régime de Saddam est l’organisation des Etats arabes, cette ligue créée il y a plus d’un demi-siècle, devenue la risée des opinions arabes. Son coup de grâce devait être consommé durant la guerre du Golfe en 1990, mais a pu être réanimée juste pour la façade, pour justifier quelques emplois pour hauts fonctionnaires de régimes à la recherche de voie de garage pour diplomates en fin de parcours ou en disgrâce. La ligue est morte de sa belle mort en ce 9 avril, en dépit des atermoiements et des louvoiements, car le plus douloureux, c’est l’annonce de son extinction, un aveu d’échec face à la réalité que des régimes ne veulent pas croire, admettre ni cautionner, jouant à la réanimation artificielle. Mais pour combien de temps ?
Tous les alibis bâtis autour de la guerre contre Israël se sont écroulés dès les premiers accords séparés, tous les mythes imaginés contre le bon sens se sont évaporés en 1982 lors de l’invasion israélienne au Liban. Alors que les Européens parlent officiellement de faire dissoudre l’OTAN, les régimes arabes s’accrochent encore à une illusion qui a pourtant montré toutes ses limites structurales et doctrinales. Depuis quelques semaines déjà, des sources diplomatiques avaient confirmé l’information selon laquelle des experts et des diplomates arabes planchent sur la question de créer une nouvelle organisation panarabe, dont les règles d’adhésion ne sont pas automatiques et que son fonctionnement obéirait à d’autres mécanismes plus souples et plus dynamiques.
Pour une refondation
Des contacts intenses ont eu lieu dans différentes capitales arabes, notamment du Moyen-Orient, autour de cette question. Des diplomates arabes avaient estimé qu’une rénovation de l’actuelle ligue n’est plus possible en raison des lourdeurs de son administration bureaucratisée, fonctionnant dans un style égyptiennisé et de l’héritage dévalorisant de ses échecs répétés dans tous les domaines de son intervention politique ou culturelle. L’image de marque de cette ligue a pris un sale coup avec la série de sondages officieux ou à caractère universitaire qui dévoilent l’impasse dans laquelle se trouve cette organisation née pour un temps et dans un autre contexte, et condamnée aujourd’hui à laisser place à d’autres appareils modernistes, pragmatiques, crédibles et profondément représentatifs des valeurs de la citoyenneté de la région. Pour certains diplomates, l’une des premières conditions avant la fondation d’une nouvelle organisation calquée sur le troisième millénaire est le bannissement du mot... arabe, un concept littéralement racial, c’est-à- dire synonyme de fermeture, de cloisonnement dans des affirmations et de démarches idéologiques sous la référence du mythe de la nation arabe, de l’héritage commun et des intérêts communautaires. Le sentiment d’appartenance a volé en éclats sous les coups de boutoir des spécificités régionales ou nationales, de la mondialisation et du manque des solidarités en période de crise. Aujourd’hui, ces diplomates croient que la prochaine organisation ne pourra réussir si elle se recroqueville toujours dans son postulat raciste, car les races n’existent plus, et aucune organisation internationale dans le monde n’est bâtie autour de ce critère, ni les Latins ne l’ont fait, ni les Serbes, ni les Turkmènes, ni les peuples «jaunes» ou «rouges.» Mais nos régimes sont-ils encore capables de l’admettre.
-
25th April 2003 08:26 #3
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 97
Quel idiot, mais alors !?
The Arabs will unite in a way it will blow your sick mind away..you just watch..
Ya khi ihoudi yakhi !
-
25th April 2003 16:55 #4
You fat-Cow:
Why don't you just learn the minimal thing there is to learn from this country. How people organize? You can read the constitution of the Kabyle territory you idiot.
Try to do the same in your region, and simply have a real government in Algiers. Don't you stupid see that just " yes ya baba" is what's making the entire country lesser than the 1/3 world? Algerians are different sure, some like put their head down and ass up, no problem...just do it in your own home!
Don't you stupid understand that if UGLY fat asses like just begun organizing, the security ****, will become so evident, that it is the government military junta that is hiring them? or do you want the situation to grw up to the point where SCUDS will resonate around the country? Had there been others Kurds in Iraq, US will never had to go there, and Iraqis would be managing themselves like a prime nation. But I guess you're too young to understand all of that huh? So, just reduce your ass to whatever you want to, SUCKING...
You won't have mine.
Get a life now.
-
26th April 2003 14:35 #5
Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Posts
- 42
It is very sad to see a so called man living in what he calls a civilised country insulting a young lady like this.
Using this bad & ugly language and behaving like a retarted moron who did not receive the minimum of education.
Shame on you
You need to get help and then try to get a life
-
26th April 2003 17:31 #6
Mr. Munir:
1. COntrarily to you, I do not consider women a weak-kind, as you seem to insinuate.
2. I did but answer her, she engaged me. But you are unable to consider a woman's initiative of any kind.
3. I do but follow her protocole. Tied to reason her on various threads, but she kept insulting instead of answering. So the word lady goes away, because it describes manners and protocole.
4. If you re-read you will see that she is not a POOR incapable lady. She is a self-sufficient woman who is trying to align her speech by fear for her family or her own return to ALgeria. She decorates her sentences with this qoranic garbage in political arguments, and tries to defend the regime. She is totally TERRORIZED. She fear far far away...lasting effect of living in ALgeria. It has become her 2nd nature. I hope she understand after this, that she can stand up as equal with or against people like me and has no chance with those like you, who already boxed her into a poor thing. It is the fundamental problem in Algeria. Reduction of women by status or violence.
Get a life now jack, I expect an answer to those arguments I raised above about political organizations. Abviously you cannot participate in that since you have already BOXED her in your mind. Go seek help first. WOmen will be the 1st ones to tell you that, especially ALGERIAN WOMEN. Americans won't even intertain it.







LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bangladesh
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Russia
Scotland
South Africa
Ukraine
Virtual Countries