OK correct but if you were to find the smallest number that satisfies the conditions, 52921 wouldn't be the one!Originally posted by phylay
n = 52921
thanks to Gauss![]()
+ Reply to Thread
Results 582 to 588 of 996
Thread: Logic Q
-
9th September 2005 22:34 #582
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 7,640
Re: ok

-
9th September 2005 22:37 #583
Guest
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Forumistan
- Posts
- 8,117
Re: Re: ok
Lol, 25201Originally posted by Amina-DZ
OK correct but if you were to find the smallest number that satisfies the conditions, 52921 wouldn't be the one!Originally posted by phylay
n = 52921
thanks to Gauss

-
9th September 2005 22:38 #584
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 7,640
Re: A new one
Come onOriginally posted by phylay
How can the group cross the bridge in 17 minutes?

Annie + Bob (2 mins)
Annie returns (1 min)
Volodia Mitlin + Dorothy (10 mins)
Bob returns (2 mins)
Annie + Bob (2 mins)
2 + 1 + 10 + 2 + 2 = 17 mins

-
9th September 2005 22:39 #585
Guest
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Forumistan
- Posts
- 8,117
Re: Re: A new one
hahaha, I must admit I am not that good at finding hard onesOriginally posted by Amina-DZ
Come onOriginally posted by phylay
How can the group cross the bridge in 17 minutes?

Annie + Bob (2 mins)
Annie returns (1 min)
Volodia Mitlin + Dorothy (10 mins)
Bob returns (2 mins)
Annie + Bob (2 mins)
2 + 1 + 10 + 2 + 2 = 17 mins
-
9th September 2005 22:47 #586
Guest
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Forumistan
- Posts
- 8,117
Here are two so called “thought problems” for you. It is said that Albert Einstein was fond of “thought experiments” and used it as a powerful tool (or rather tried to use, I should say) against protagonists of the then new “quantum theory”. We are nowhere near that league but, who knows, which Einstein is hiding among our viewers?
One can use, of course, pen and paper, to remove any cobwebs in the mind.
A man, say, Tom, climbs a mountain through a fixed route on a weekend- Saturday. He starts at 06.00 hrs at the bottom of the mountain and climbs with totally haphazard speed (totally unpredictable varying speeds) and reaches the top of the mountain by noon-12.00hrs. Having done enough mountaineering for a day, he decides to enjoy the scenery and take the remaining day off on the peak.
The next day, exactly at 06.00hrs sharp, he starts to climb down again using the same path, which he had taken the previous day; again the speed of climbing down is also totally haphazard and totally unpredictable. He manages to reach the bottom from where he started a day earlier exactly at 12.00 hrs noon.
Now, given that he climbed both up and down the mountain at totally erratic speeds but with the time of commencement and completion being the same, will there be any point of elevation (or to say in other words, a location in the path) he was present at the same time on both the days?
Obviously there are possible answers:
a) No, can never be; erratic speeds preclude that.
b) May be, one can never be sure.
c) Yes, definitely.
What is the answer you will vote for?
-
9th September 2005 22:56 #587
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 7,640
Is there a mistake?
Differentiation Method
Let a^b mean a "raised to" b
1^2 = 1
2^2 = 2 + 2
3^2 = 3 + 3 + 3
so for any X > 0
X^2 = X + X + X + ..... (X times)
Differentiate both sides with resepct to X
2X = 1 + 1 + 1 + ... (X times)
2X = X
2 = 1 .... Cancelling X from both sides as X <> 0

-
9th September 2005 23:23 #588
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 7,640
c) Yes, definitely.Originally posted by phylay
a) No, can never be; erratic speeds preclude that.
b) May be, one can never be sure.
c) Yes, definitely.
What is the answer you will vote for?








LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bangladesh
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Russia
Scotland
South Africa
Ukraine
Virtual Countries